<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OPUS 4 Latest Documents RSS Feed</title>
    <description>Latest documents</description>
    <link>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/index/index/</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:16:59 +0200</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:16:59 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Japanese wa, mo, ga, wo, na, no</title>
      <link>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14739</link>
      <description>Lone Takeuchi’s stimulating book (1999) has given me an opportunity to reconsider my (unpublished) semiotactic analysis of Japanese particles [...].</description>
      <author>Frederik H. H. Kortlandt</author>
      <category>article</category>
      <guid>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14739</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:16:59 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Syntax and semantics in the history of Chinese</title>
      <link>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14736</link>
      <description>The philosophy of language comes in three varieties. 1. The functionalist’s view: linguistic forms are instruments used to convey meaningful elements. This is the basis of European structuralism. 2. The formalist’s view: linguistic forms are abstract structures which can be filled with meaningful elements. This is the basis of generative grammar. 3. The parasitologist’s view: linguistic forms are vehicles for the reproduction of meaningful elements. This is the view which I advocated twelve years ago in a Festschrift (1985).</description>
      <author>Frederik H. H. Kortlandt</author>
      <category>article</category>
      <guid>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14736</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:06:22 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proto-Indo-European verbal syntax</title>
      <link>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14634</link>
      <description>It is argued that the PIE thematic flexion can be compared with the objective conjugation of the Uralic languages. The thematic vowel referred to an object in the absolutive (asigmatic nominative) case.</description>
      <author>Frederik H. H. Kortlandt</author>
      <category>article</category>
      <guid>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14634</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:50:44 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Temporal gradation and temporal limitation</title>
      <link>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14633</link>
      <description>In his magnum opus (Syntax and Semantics, Leiden 1978, henceforth: S&amp;S) C.L. Ebeling makes a distinction between temporal gradation (pp 301-308 and 337-339) and temporal limitation (pp 311-315). In the case of temporal gradation “p , q”, the meaning “q” specifies the time during which the referent carries the mean-ing “p”.</description>
      <author>Frederik H. H. Kortlandt</author>
      <category>article</category>
      <guid>http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14633</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:39:10 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
