OPUS 4 Latest Documents RSS FeedLatest documents
http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/index/index/
Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:22:26 +0200Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:22:26 +0200On correctness of buffer implementations in a concurrent lambda calculus with futures
http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6666
Motivated by the question of correctness of a specific implementation of concurrent buffers in the lambda calculus with futures underlying Alice ML, we prove that concurrent buffers and handled futures can correctly encode each other. Correctness means that our encodings preserve and reflect the observations of may- and must-convergence. This also shows correctness wrt. program semantics, since the encodings are adequate translations wrt. contextual semantics. While these translations encode blocking into queuing and waiting, we also provide an adequate encoding of buffers in a calculus without handles, which is more low-level and uses busy-waiting instead of blocking. Furthermore we demonstrate that our correctness concept applies to the whole compilation process from high-level to low-level concurrent languages, by translating the calculus with buffers, handled futures and data constructors into a small core language without those constructs.Jan Schwinghammer; David Sabel; Joachim Niehren; Manfred Schmidt-Schaußworkingpaperhttp://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6666Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:22:26 +0200On proving the equivalence of concurrency primitives
http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6036
Various concurrency primitives have been added to sequential programming languages, in order to turn them concurrent. Prominent examples are concurrent buffers for Haskell, channels in Concurrent ML, joins in JoCaml, and handled futures in Alice ML. Even though one might conjecture that all these primitives provide the same expressiveness, proving this equivalence is an open challenge in the area of program semantics. In this paper, we establish a first instance of this conjecture. We show that concurrent buffers can be encoded in the lambda calculus with futures underlying Alice ML. Our correctness proof results from a systematic method, based on observational semantics with respect to may and must convergence.Jan Schwinghammer; David Sabel; Joachim Niehren; Manfred Schmidt-Schaußworkingpaperhttp://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6036Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:20:55 +0100Adequacy of compositional translations for observational semantics
http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/192
We investigate methods and tools for analysing translations between programming languages with respect to observational semantics. The behaviour of programs is observed in terms of may- and must-convergence in arbitrary contexts, and adequacy of translations, i.e., the reﬂection of program equivalence, is taken to be the fundamental correctness condition. For compositional translations we propose a notion of convergence equivalence as a means for proving adequacy. This technique avoids explicit reasoning about contexts, and is able to deal with the subtle role of typing in implementations of language extension.Manfred Schmidt-Schauß; Joachim Niehren; Jan Schwinghammer; David Sabelworkingpaperhttp://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/192Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:07:51 +0100Program Equivalence for a Concurrent Lambda Calculus with Futures
http://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2181
Reasoning about the correctness of program transformations requires a notion of program equivalence. We present an observational semantics for the concurrent lambda calculus with futures Lambda(fut), which formalizes the operational semantics of the programming language Alice ML. We show that natural program optimizations, as well as partial evaluation with respect to deterministic rules, are correct for Lambda(fut). This relies on a number of fundamental properties that we establish for our observational semantics.Joachim Niehren; David Sabel; Manfred Schmidt-Schauß; Jan Schwinghammerworkingpaperhttp://publikationen.stub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2181Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:54:30 +0100